On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 10:04 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 23:02 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > > livecd-tools.x86_64: E: no-binary > > We don't have any arch specific binaries, so it should be a noarch > package? > > I presume it's not noarch since it has different RPM requires on > different arches?
Correct. This is just one of those cases where rpmlint isn't always correct > > livecd-tools.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > > This is that /usr/lib/livecd-creator/mayflower should be in /usr/share? > Any reason not to? Leaving it in /usr/lib keeps things working for people running various versions. Longer term, it needs to go away anyway and be replaced with mkinitrd handling live images correctly. Jeremy -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
