On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 12:43 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > Jeremy Katz wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 17:30 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > I really don't like -default, though. > > It can go away... The implication though is that the officially released > version would actually be a localized version. I intended -default to be > non-localized, yet at the localization (higher) level so that the > released spin is valid for everyone. Would the bits in '-default' be at > a higher level, a localized spin would inherit all the "default" > localization bits (@*-support).
No, I get the point... it's just naming that's tricky here > > 'base' has been pretty good, but -base-base-desktop seems odd :) > > > > From where I'm sitting, 'desktop' as it is right now is a spin concept > (fedora-live-gnome.ks if you will). I'm sure there's bits all "Desktop" > spins need (now livecd-fedora-8-base-desktop.ks): XFCE, KDE and "GNOME" > (now 'desktop') come to mind. A true GNOME spin would be a different beast than the desktop livecd we do today. But I really don't want to have this lengthy and pointless bikeshed discussion again. > For now though, all spins are desktop > orientated spins and hence there's no problem including the bits that > make a desktop oriented spin in the base kickstart. Would non-desktop > oriented spins rise to the surface, I'm sure that within a level we can > distinct between certain branches. Right now I'm thinking > 'fedora-live-base-desktop.ks' vs. 'fedora-live-base-runlevel3.ks' but I > would rather not commit to a model now only to find out it's invalid at > the moment the first new spin concept comes along. Yeah, a lot better to wait and deal with it when it comes up and there's a real user rather than trying to just do something in advance of users. > >> Although possibly a futile point at this moment; A stock Fedora 8 > >> compose from the kickstarts currently in livecd-tools' GIT repo > >> (including updates!), and one that only includes @dutch-support (new > >> model, also including updates). > > > > Sure you're not building x86_64 images? As that looks pretty close to > > the x86_64 size. If not, then ahh, the fun of the ever-growing distro! > > These were x86_64 composes, the point was the difference between a > "default" spin (including @*-support), and a localized spin. Seems about like I'd expect then. Also, note that, eg, the KDE spin already today is non-localized due to the space requirements for the kde-i18n/kde-l10n packages Jeremy -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
