On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 19:05 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Sean Godsell wrote: > > I don't know why fedora didn't > > take the time to use squashfs+lzma, but it is worth it. I hope they put > > it in the next release. > > Most likely because it doesn't appear to be included in the upstream kernel. > When/if it is, > this is a no-brainer.
Or even included by the upstream squashfs maintainer[1] Jeremy [1] squashfs already isn't upstream. layering more patches of non-upstreamed-ness on top is just going to make the lives of the kernel maintainers *more* painful. -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
