----- "Jeremy Katz" <[email protected]> wrote: > > We use "aufs" to union a COW filesystem for our custom "Live" > system. It does seem a little odd that many of the other distros now > use a union filesystem approach to LiveCDs and NFS read-only roots but > Fedora has for the time being stayed away from it. It's not like there > isn't lots of custom stuff being put into fedora/redhat kernels that > isn't yet upstream. In fact there was a discussion about getting > UnionFS upstream recently on the kernel list.... > > A discussion that went nowhere fast. Just like every previous > discussion of unionfs. And actually, we're _very_ resistent to > adding not-upstreamed stuff into the Fedora kernels. Things that are in an > appropriate staging tree? Yeah. But unionfs isn't even there
I have been playing around with the 2.6.28 fc10 kernel from Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79697 It looks like it has the UnionFS patches included. Maybe it'll drop out of a final release though. Daire -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
