On Friday, July 24 2009, Marc Herbert said: > I am currently using livecd-iso-to-disk to create USB images. How does this > isohybrid > technique compare to it? Is it meant to replace it in the future?
livecd-iso-to-disk (or really liveusb-creator) is always going to be the "preferred" way of creating a USB image. With the tool you get the advantage that it's a non-destructive operation, you can set up things like persistence and you can mount and use the disk "normally" to hold more stuff. isohybrid, though, is nice for a quick trial run or for people on a platform that livecd-iso-to-disk/liveusb-creator can't work due to an inability to run syslinux or other reasons (OS/X being the obvious big one, probably the rest of the BSDs as well) Jeremy -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list