We're having a FF board meeting tomorrow. This topic -- "official communications" -- will come up. Will keep you posted.
--g --------------------------------------------------------------- Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Foundation || fedoraproject.org Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors --------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:26 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > >Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:03 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > > >>>>Developers have been > > >>>>communicating that this release cycle was only for FC5 for quite a > > >>>>while > > >>>>now. > > >>>Yeah, and it seems that was not enough. > > >>Depends on where you get the information from. For example, distrowatch > > >>corrected its previous misconception recently. > > >>http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060123#1 > > >That's not "official" - > > > > > What do you consider official?. > > Me? If it is written somewhere on the fedora-webpages. A signed mail to > one of the mailinglists from a official person. A press-release. > > But you should ask what is "official" for journalists or > wikipedia-writers. > > > How do we communicate all the official > > information out there to make sure there isnt too many assumptions? > > At least we *should clarify* wrong or unclear assumptions in the > community if they are floating around like this one. > > How? Red Hat magazine? fedora.redhat.com? Wiki probably is not the best > place because I suspect some people don't trust the informations there. > -- > Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > Fedora-marketing-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list > -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
