* Rahul Sundaram (2007-01-11 22:34 +0530) said: > You are probably talking about GNU FDL documents with invariant > sections. They do have various other documents licensed differently > in their package archive. The presence of non-free repository makes > Fedora's position much more on stronger on Free software licenses > IMO. I consider the licenses of functional software more important > that documentation, artwork and content. There are different rules > that apply. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FreeSoftwareAnalysis/FSF
I am very glad to hear this. I think I got the wrong impression. -- Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com> (GPG Key: 9283AA3F) -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
