On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Zhukov Pavel wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2008 3:05 AM, Jon Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 2, 2008 6:59 PM, Zhukov Pavel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > KDE 4.0.1 already in rawhide AFAIK.
> >
> > Yep, kdebase-4.0.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm is in the tree that I'm installing
> > from. That's something of a major change, right? Should I point that
> > out if I show KDE stuff? Or is the "these bits are newer than alpha"
> > disclaimer good enough?
> >
> > --
> >
> > Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
> >
>
> yes 4.0.1 contain a lot of fixes and improvements. but f9 will have
> 4.0.2 or even 4.0.3, so we can talk about it as about "will be highly
> improved"
>
I was wondering not only about what we're going to say but how we're going
to say it. How are we going to get people to know about the features in
our alpha?
-Mike
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
