why cant we use another free video format that doesn't have this kind of trouble..
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jeff Spaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Valent Turkovic > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are two projects; saya-videoeditor [3], myvideoeditor [4] > > saya currently relies on the OpenVIP media framework..which uses ffmpeg. > the reliance on ffmpeg makes its nearly impossible to include in > Fedora. I can not stress this enough, applications which have compile > time dependencies on ffmpeg will be difficult to place in Fedora. > Unless someone figures out how to patch out the encumbered > technologies in ffmpeg, we can't ship ffmpeg. And even if we did find > a way to patch out everything we can't distribute, it may not be worth > doing because we would be in effect shipping a significantly crippled > ffmpeg library since ffmpeg does not understand the concept of > pluggable runtime codec support. > > Its a real shame, if we could ship a limited version of ffmpeg which > support unencumbered codec technologies we would have the ability to > ship versions of several multimedia frameworks and applications. But > the way ffmpeg is structured as a project and a codebase, makes its > difficult to safely work with. > > -jef > > -- > Fedora-marketing-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > :::: CONTRIBUA COM O MEIO AMBIENTE. NÃO IMPRIMA ESTA MENSAGEM ::::: > > >
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
