On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Duvelle Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You know, I am not too sure about the reasoning to that decision. But > that is something that should be up for discussion, there may or may not > be legal repercussion for the use of a non-open typeface. (and I am no > legal expert, so I am not sure to what those repercussion might be.)
Red Hat has paid for the use of the font in the logo, and can distribute copies of the logo royalty-free. The only reason that someone might need a copy of the font is to modify the logo, and per the trademark guidelines, that should never occur, therefore there is no legal ramification to distributing the logo as is. -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
