On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 06:01:21PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: > hi, > digging into this -mms-bitfields problem (and openssl package) i come to > the conclusion it'd be better if we can solve the whole cflags issue in > some more general way. ie. currently rpm use RPM_OPT_FLAGS which use > optflags which defined in /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc and /usr/lib/rpm/**/macros. > it'd be better if we somehow can define that the current build's > platform is win32 and rpm set all flags according to it. this's exactly > what i do in %_mingw32_env, but if we can use some kind of rpm internal > mechanism, then probably we can build much more easily native fedora > packages. eg in case of openssl the native package hack Configure in > openssl-0.9.8g-redhat.patch to use RPM_OPT_FLAGS. so we can use the same > patch the same mechanism to for mingw too and in this case it'll work > for all packages (where we'll forget about -mms-bitfields and may be > other flags). > in case of openssl we still need some ugly hack but in case of other > packages this may help a lot. > is there any rpm gurus here?
Whatever the answer is, if it involves changing base rpm packages, it has to be discussed on fedora-devel-list (or even the upstream rpm.org list). It's not something we can even speculate about here ... Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
