On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 11:12:51PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:31:46PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
> >> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:42:56PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
> >>>> hi,
> >>>> what was the reason to not add -fstack-protector to mingw's cflags?
> >>>> i didn't see the reason.
> >>> It didn't work -- at least in the version of GCC that I tried it with
> >>> originally.  IIRC compiled OK, but there was a missing symbol when
> >>> linking.  Maybe it does work now.  I haven't tested it recently.
> >>>
> >>> BTW, we are all away until Jan 2nd ~ 5th, so don't expect much to
> >>> happen before next week.
> >> what's not compile? gcc or any given package?
> > 
> > It does in fact appear to work now.  Does this mean that our C flags
> > are identical to the standard Fedora C flags?
> 
> almost. i'd like to be as little different as possible. so the only
> difference in this case would be the mms...
> would you change flags in the filesystem macro?

I forgot about the bitfields flag.  However it seems we can do this ...

  %define _mingw32_cflags %{__global_cflags} -mms-bitfields

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v
_______________________________________________
fedora-mingw mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw

Reply via email to