Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:08:58PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: >> Farkas Levente wrote: >>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>>> Note that the directory layout for mingw64 is somewhat different from >>>> mingw32. I arrived at what I think is the right structure after >>>> extensive discussions and help from members of the mingw-w64 project. >>>> >>>> /usr/x86_64-pc-mingw32/sys-root/ (prefix & sysroot) >>>> share >>>> x86_64-pc-mingw32 >>>> mingw -> x86_64-pc-mingw32 >>>> >>>> /usr/x86_64-pc-mingw32/sys-root/x86_64-pc-mingw32 (exec_prefix) >>>> bin (bindir) >>>> include (includedir) >>>> include64 -> include >>>> lib (libdir) >>> can you explain it a bit? >>> why mingw32 and not mingw64? >>> >>> why /usr/x86_64-pc-mingw32/sys-root/x86_64-pc-mingw32 and not >>> /usr/x86_64-pc-mingw32/sys-root/? >>> >>> anyway the same question apply to mingw32 why >>> /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/ and why not >>> /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/? >> or why not /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/mingw/ ? > > This isn't a matter of guesswork or how we'd like it to be. Upstream > have set up their binutils, compiler, headers etc to work with a > specific directory structure. > > We have to replicate that structure. > > Otherwise it doesn't work.
are you sure? i'll test it next week. what's the best and easiest way to test the whole system? -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
