Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:57:54PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 10:32:58PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>>> ACKed and applied to the Mercurial repository.
>>>> in the meantime there is a newer native version:-(
>>>> and here is the patches for this.
>>> Is this patch still waiting for attention?
>> yes imho should have to apply to the hg (at least this still diff from
>> the hg repo). anyway why is there the hg repo when openssl is in fedora cvs?
> 
> I should have removed it from the hg repository, and if I didn't then
> that's a mistake.  As is the case here, so I'll remove it shortly.
> 
> Can you repost the latest version of your patch against the Fedora
> CVS, and I'll try to take a look at it on Monday.

sorry, fedora cvs already contains the latest version i just check
against the hg wrongly:-(

-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
_______________________________________________
fedora-mingw mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw

Reply via email to