On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:47:04AM -0400, NightStrike wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 02:25:35PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> >> Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> > (2)? Use mingw-w64 project to build 32 bit w32api/runtime, since >> >> > mingw-w64 seems to be more active. >> >> >> >> They're still missing some stuff though, e.g. the DDK headers. >> > >> > Does anything support DDK (eg. current MinGW 32 bit)? >> > >> > I don't really know much about this, but I do know that many people >> > have asked if we can compile device drivers. This would be very >> > useful for virt, for example (to compile virtio drivers for Windows). >> > >> > Rich. >> >> We aren't missing directx-x stuff. They just aren't in the trunk, >> they're in the experimental area. The reason for this is that they >> were copied from Wine. If you want directx, you can either get the >> DDK and use it directly, or use what's from Wine, or use what we >> copied from Wine. > > Can you explain what the different TLAs mean? DDK, etc? > > As I say I don't know much about this stuff.
Well actually, Kai just pointed out to me that I misread the original email. I thought he was talking about the directx SDK, not the Driver Development Kit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Driver_Kit). Too many acronyms, too little sleep :) _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
