On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 03:12:08PM +0200, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > - Packages in group 1 are always in sync among the different branches > (there may be a small delay to test changes, but eventually the > changes should to applied to all branches)
Do we really want to keep updating older branches at all? Could we have a policy which says we'll put new development effort into the devel/ branch, and effectively freeze the previous branches? The freeze would only be broken if (a) there was a necessary security update or (b) someone files a BZ to get a package backported. I feel this would mean less work all round for packagers. > - Packages in group 2 are always in sync with the native version > of each branch Also have a look at Dan's tools for tracking native/MinGW versions: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/compare Rich. _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
