Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510949 --- Comment #7 from Hin-Tak Leung <[email protected]> 2009-07-16 17:07:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > it's not that simple. since we build all current dlls with sjlj we've to > rebuild all mingw packages and none of the previous dlls can be linked with > current ones:-( Bring the package up to date source code-wise and incoporating the 13 upstream mingw patches, and switching the exception model are two different issues - the former is easy (and I already did it with the tarball I posted). The latter I know is a bit tricky. OTOH, I have 39 of mingw32-* packages on my system and only 4 have a sjlj-1.dll dependence (from "rpm -q --whatrequires 'mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll)'") - mostly libraries written in c++ or one with a non-c binding. A majority of mingw32 packages currently available from fedora 11 are not affected if a switch is made - you just need to rebuild *some* packages, and a minority, I think. I think a switch should be made *eventually*, especially now that the mingw project itself has switched to dw2. Maybe for the f12 time frame? - should I file that separately? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
