Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513826





--- Comment #8 from Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>  2009-07-28 05:14:09 
EDT ---
> I'm not sure if this proposal is serious or not, but
> it would completely break every package in the repository.

I'm sure we agreed that this bug, if it is fixed, would require changing every
package in the repository.

> (to work around that another change is required in the
> mingw32_configure macro).

No, this would be totally wrong!  The configure and make phases should use
exactly the same prefix that is used at run-time.

> What is it that you want to archieve with these changes? All that it causes is
> mass-breakage with no benefit in the end..  

Many things.  For example, say I'm a developer that bundles Fedora's gtk+ DLLs
with his own binary.  I get a report that my binary distribution does not work
on Windows.  I have to see if it's a problem in my code or in Fedora's.  So I
take the Fedora sys-root, copy it to a real Windows machine, install MSYS and
try to build my package.  Except that this doesn't work because the Fedora
sys-root is not a sys-root (because it includes references to paths in the
cross-compilation environment), so this does not work

Or, avoiding that the *Windows* binaries in the sysroot include references to
the /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root path.  This is equivalent to having the
mock-buildroot in a binary RPM, which is flagged by rpmlint as a serious error.

IOW, I admire a lot the mingw32 packages and they were a useful tool for me. 
But independent of whether they work, unfortunately they have some flaws that
are pretty fundamental and should be fixed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
fedora-mingw mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw

Reply via email to