>> AM_PATH_GLIB_2_0 will detect mismatched header files vs. >> installed libraries, while PKG_CHECK_MODULES, so your solution is not >> 100% equivalent. > > So far, in us packaging about 100 packages (many dependent on glib), > this has not proved a problem.
Because you do not have Wine installed, so that check is not run. A user (not a fedora packager) will have it 99% of the time. > There's no issue with mismatching headers and libraries because > everything is installed via RPM. If you do not fix bug 513825, the configure script will get the Linux pkg-config, not the cross pkg-config. Then it will definitely report (if you have Wine installed, and with today's Fedora 11) mismatched headers and libraries. Do you want me to prepare a screencast?!? >>> Now please answer my question: >>> >>> Which package are you trying to build? >> Pick any one in this list: >> >> http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=AM_PATH_GLIB_2_0 >> http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=AM_PATH_GTK_2_0 >> >> I could say xchat from latest CVS. (I did try to build it before >> writing this, and it failed). > > So xchat, specifically, is the package that you tried to make? Yes. Paolo _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
