Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539698 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> 2009-11-24 05:06:10 EDT --- Another thought: Shouldn't RPM be able to install the files anyway unless they are different? The binutils & mingw32-binutils packages would have identical upstream source and hence identical files, *unless* one of the packages was patching the source files. It turns out that binutils patches the following source files: bfd/elfcode.h bfd/section.c ld/ldmain.c mingw32-binutils doesn't patch any files. (But should it do?) The list of files doesn't quite match the conflicting files reported in comment 0, although it is fairly similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
