Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546998





--- Comment #13 from Chris Bagwell <[email protected]>  2009-12-15 12:48:29 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > Patch looks good to me.  Erik, Kalev, any objections?  
> The patch is against F-12's version of mingw32-gcc. In rawhide we already have
> a newer version (mingw32-gcc-4_4_2-1_fc13). Please post a unified diff against
> the rawhide version of mingw32-gcc. The .spec can be found at
> http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/mingw32-gcc/devel/mingw32-gcc.spec?view=log

I will do soon.  I'll attempt to upgrade compiler to rawhide on my Fedora 12
box.

> 
> In addition to Kalev's remarks I also discovered something:
> The %package section is missing a Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} 

Make sense and I can add in next revision.  Is this also a gcc.spec issue as
well and if so should one of us bugzilla it?

And to be safe, since I'm using "package -n mingw32-libgomp", will %{name} get
converted to mingw32-gcc or mingw32-libgomp within that block or is it always
fixed to "Name:" value?

Chris

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
fedora-mingw mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw

Reply via email to