Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 10:50 EST ------- Not sure about the naming convention for this one. compat- packages usually build without -devel packages and are there for runtime rather than build-time compatibility with older apps. The only compat-*-devel packages I can find in FC5 or FE5 are the wxGTK packages. For build-time compatibility, a name like gtkhtml36 would seem more sensible, but that could cause confusion with the main package being gtkhtml3 and hence giving the appearance of being "older". However, this does meet the package naming guidelines, which the compat- package doesn't. Another thing: are the static libraries really needed? Minor nit: warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.6.so.18 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.6.so.18.0.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
