Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 11:16 EST ------- To Paul: They are chmod'ed after they're installed, and they don't have execute permission in the final package. So RPM is looking in the build tree for debug stuff instead of the install tree? That's pretty odd; I'll have to poke around further. To Gérard: Good point about the extra provide; all sorts of packages (even language addon packages like perl-PDL) do this without issue, so I'll drop my objection. It would certainly simply a few things of c_src were simply omitted, but I don't know enough about erlang to understand whether that's possible. I suggest trying out Paul's suggestion to see if it keeps RPM from stuffing unnecessary things into the debuginfo package. About the license, I have no problems with it as it stands; I was hoping that someone else would have some advice. The license text is at http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/esdl-license.terms if anyone wants to take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review