Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 11:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Possibly. I'm not 100% certain, but I think SGI's is what was present in > XFree86 and X.Org monolithic source tree. This matches with my memory. > Might want to have the license police go over it with a fine tooth comb > first though, as ISTR there being some bad-juju SGI licenses in the tree, c.f. http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/projects/ogl-sample/main/gfx/lib/glw/ http://oss.sgi.com/projects/ogl-sample/faq.html and http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/inventor/libSoXt/src/ http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/inventor/libSoXt/include [Contains slightly modified LGPL'ed versions of the GLw widgets] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
