Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-27 03:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > * rpmlint warnings: > W: gcompris incoherent-version-in-changelog 7.4-2 7.4-1 My bad I added a changelog entry for my changes but forgot to bump Release: I will fix this (easy). > W: gcompris-devel no-dependency-on gcompris Thats because it depends on gcompris-libs, where the actual libs are thats what you get with program and libs (and data) in one _big_ upstream tarbal. > ...plus some 'no documentation' warnings that you might be able to ignore. > gcompris comes with plenty of documentation in the main package in a lot of languages, so yes I intend to ignore these :) > * gcompris-desktop.patch has the following line that should probably be > removed: > Only in gcompris-7.4: gcompris.desktop.in~ > Thats because I used diff not gendiff to generate the diff, this is totaly harmless, but I can remove it if it makes you happy. > * Only builds on the devel branch due to missing libassetml for FC-5. > My grand master plan was / is to ask for a FC-5 cvs branch for libassetml, gnucap and gcompris all at the same time. > * The icon in the .desktop files are missing the .png extension, but the icons > in the icon directory end in .png. > Other .desktop files have this too (gsview for example) it works fine either way,but my desktop patch did screw up the .desktop translations, so I have to fix that anyways, I can also add the .png at the same time if you want, but that would be unnescesarry deviation from upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review