Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-27 03:04 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> * rpmlint warnings:
> W: gcompris incoherent-version-in-changelog 7.4-2 7.4-1

My bad I added a changelog entry for my changes but forgot to bump Release: I
will fix this (easy).

> W: gcompris-devel no-dependency-on gcompris

Thats because it depends on gcompris-libs, where the actual libs are thats what
you get with program and libs (and data) in one _big_ upstream tarbal.

> ...plus some 'no documentation' warnings that you might be able to ignore.
> 

gcompris comes with plenty of documentation in the main package in a lot of
languages, so yes I intend to ignore these :)

> * gcompris-desktop.patch has the following line that should probably be 
> removed:
> Only in gcompris-7.4: gcompris.desktop.in~
> 

Thats because I used diff not gendiff to generate the diff, this is totaly
harmless, but I can remove it if it makes you happy.

> * Only builds on the devel branch due to missing libassetml for FC-5.
> 

My grand master plan was / is to ask for a FC-5 cvs branch for libassetml,
gnucap and gcompris all at the same time.

> * The icon in the .desktop files are missing the .png extension, but the icons
> in the icon directory end in .png.
> 

Other .desktop files have this too (gsview for example) it works fine either
way,but my desktop patch did screw up the .desktop translations, so I have to
fix that anyways, I can also add the .png at the same time if you want, but that
would be unnescesarry deviation from upstream.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to