Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-27 09:37 EST ------- > I'm sure blam can be patched to use gecko-sharp2, but that's work that > should happen upstream. Well, it's work that should coordinate with upstream. If it's a simple fix, there's no reason not to make it and carry the patch until upstream incorporates it if it lets us avoid adding what is essentially a dead package into extras. That said, there's certainly precedent for keeping in extras old packages that have been superceded by incompatible versions in core. (See gtk+.) But it's worth at least asking upstream to see what their plans are and what they recommend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
