Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-06 15:17 EST ------- Ok, I kinda strongly prefer the %{_libdir} approach for the dependency handling I concider the other approach somewhat ugly. If a third part package causes things to break we will handle that the. If rpm doesn't mind different timestamps on the README I'm happy with things as they are too. Summarazing, could you attach a new spec with the %{_libdir} approach, then I'll review it, Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
