Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-08 23:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Ralf, could you either indicate where in the guidelines this type of thing is > forbidden or at least point to some discussion on the matter? Your final > statement about the package being disqualified from Extras seems awfully > arbitrary without it. This is not a matter of taste nor of personal preference. It's a mere technical requirement implied by autoconf's and a compiler's working principles (cf. info autoconf, search the autoconf mailing lists archive). Or to put it in short: This package is unusable. > I have no opinion one way or the other on this issue because I am not familiar > with it, but if you're just making up policy then I don't think it's fair to > the package submitter. Sorry, but I am not making up packaging policies here nor am I accusing the packager. It's simply a case of "this package's sources are broken and need to be reworked to be functional". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedoraemail@example.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review