Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-09 10:23 EST ------- Actually, here is a list of packages that include a generated config header, on my FC-5¹: gd-devel glibmm24-devel gtkmm24-devel gtkmm2-devel libjpeg-devel libsigc++20-devel libsigc++-devel libtiff-devel openldap-devel postgresql-devel Some come from FC-5 and other from FE-5. ¹) generated with: rpm -qf $(grep -l Generated /usr/lib*/*/include/*.h /usr/include/*.h| grep -v qt-3) | sort -u However, I agree that autoheaders should not be installed in the system. Perhaps should we fill a bug report for these different packages. I am very willing to have libpar2 and gpar2 in FE. Can you explain what could be a solution of a library that need autobuild tools to define some object types and operations? libpar2 needs to know the endianess to define types leu16, leu32, and leu64 (see letype.h). These three types are equal to uint16_t, uint32_t and uint64_t, on little endian platforms, but are classes with cast operations on big endian platforms. What mechanism could use libpar2 to avoid installing autoheader, so that letype.h is correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
