Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-11 12:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #77) > > Thank's now it works. > > Must the file called ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-13FC5.src.rpm or > > ctapi-cyberjack-FC5.src.rpm simple ctapi-cyberjack.src.rpm ? > > I don't mean to offend, but I am surprised that by the end of this lengthy > process you are asking basic questions like this. Please review the packaging > guidelines and package naming guidelines carefully, as understanding them are > very important to Fedora cvsextras membership. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines Warren, He was asking howot name the SRPM to pass to cvs-import.sh a bit strange question I must admit but nothing something that can be found in the guidelines AFAIK. Frank, I just saw on the cvs-commit that you committed changes to an FC-4 version, I hope your CVS branch request got handled that quickly, or did you do something else to get the other branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
