Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: socat

------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-12 03:16 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Some more packages only put in their development 
> (CVS)
> tree, and just put the configure script and not the autoconf/automake in.
> Sometimes this is done to prevent dependancies on autoconfig/automake. I don't
> think it is a big issue for building this package.

In addition to Ralf's comments, which I agree with, I'd add that it's normal
practice to ship the and that these do not introduce
buildreqs on autotools if the timestamps on the files are correct, i.e.
configure is later than the files used to generate it.

> permissions on the debug rpm files after install is 644 for files and 755 for
> directories. So everyone can read everything. What is exactly going wrong?

I was going to look into this but the package
doesn't build for me on my FC5 i386 desktop, with the same failure mode as in
Comment #4.

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Fedora-package-review mailing list

Reply via email to