Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-13 23:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > If the static library is dropped, this package should be fine. Ralf? Well, I don't know. The OP claimed there were technical requirements to ship the static libs. So, from my (package review focused) perspective, a minimum requirement to proceed would be him to either drop the static libs or to prove the necessity of includeing them. I.e. yes, dropping the static lib would remove one road blocker. The other issue (shared library names) is my personal preference (I consider "Drepper-style" library naming useless featuritis), which will cause me not approve a package. But it's not a technical problem, which should prevent others from approving a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
