Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-15 10:37 EST -------
Updated:
Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-XMPP.spec
SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-XMPP-1.0-2.fc5.src.rpm

Additionally, with respect to licensing, the author indicates that perl (GPL &
Artistic) is the correct license:

Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:52:31 -0500
From: Ryan Eatmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Net::XMPP license question

Yep.


Chris Weyl wrote:
> Hey Ryan--
> 
> Quick question.  I'm in the middle of packaging up Net::XMPP (and for
> that matter, XML::Stream and Net::Jabber) for fedora extras, and it
> was pointed out to me that while Net/XMPP.pm states "COPYRIGHT: This
> module is free software, you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> under the same terms as Perl itself", the actual archive includes a
> LICENSE.LGPL.
> 
> Are all three of these modules under "the same terms as Perl itself"?
> 
> Thanks:)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to