Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-15 10:37 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-XMPP.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-XMPP-1.0-2.fc5.src.rpm Additionally, with respect to licensing, the author indicates that perl (GPL & Artistic) is the correct license: Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:52:31 -0500 From: Ryan Eatmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Net::XMPP license question Yep. Chris Weyl wrote: > Hey Ryan-- > > Quick question. I'm in the middle of packaging up Net::XMPP (and for > that matter, XML::Stream and Net::Jabber) for fedora extras, and it > was pointed out to me that while Net/XMPP.pm states "COPYRIGHT: This > module is free software, you can redistribute it and/or modify it > under the same terms as Perl itself", the actual archive includes a > LICENSE.LGPL. > > Are all three of these modules under "the same terms as Perl itself"? > > Thanks:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedoraemail@example.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review