Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-16 15:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #87) > In comment #43, you sounded unsure and seemed to be speculating about binary > compatibility. Well, even if it's remotely possible, I guess we'll have to > stick with upstream and their use of these 2 static libs. I have checked. As far as I understand the makefiles, the soname will be libQtFoobar.so.4 for each library, even for the two that should have more restrictive soname. I cannot assure you that the binary compatibility will be break, but it could, as Qt developers have chosen to make them static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review