Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-17 03:36 EST ------- MUST items: - rpmlint: Clean - Package name: Ok - Spec name: Ok - Meets packaging guidelines: NEEDSWORK - License: Ok - Spec in American English: Ok - Spec legible: Ok - Sources match upstream: Ok - Builds: Ok - BuildRequires: Ok - Locales: Ok - ldconfig: Ok - Relocation: Ok - Directory ownership: Ok - %files: Ok - %clean: Ok - Macros: Ok - Code vs. Content: Ok - Documentation: Ok - devel package: Ok - .desktop file: Ok SHOULD: - Includes license text: Ok - Mock build: Ok - Builds on all archs: Built on i386, x86_64 - Package functional: Tested on i386, x86_64 - Scriptlets: Ok - Subpackages: Ok NEEDSWORK: Source: seems to need to be http://dl.sf.net/sourceforge/qjackctl/[...] otherwise I get a 404 as is. The Requires: jack-audio-connection-kit >= 0.80.0 is unnecessary as no such old version is going to be in Extras. The generic INSTALL instructions should not be packaged. The desktop file should be included as Source:, not embedded in the spec, as shown in the Desktop Files section of the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review