Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: initng

------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-19 05:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #278)
> #276
> 1. speedstep script causes an oops on shutdown

Anyone got any ideas?

> 2. iptables script is suboptimal

Hmmm... I can see what you mean. Anyone here that has the knowledge and time to 
look at it?

> 3. iptables seems not to be started with default generated runlevels

Oops. A quick look at gen_system_runlevel showed that it was a complete mess, I 
guess it hasn't worked for a while. Fixed it up in svn. Gen_system_runlevel 
mainly is a big cludge that everyone has agreed should be replaced. Question is 
with what...

> 4. #277 yeah i reported that already. its a fact that fedora seems to need a
> special presetup for the gettys according ot the infos i collected from the
> initng mailinglist.

So what _is_ the problem with Fedora? What's the difference from everybody else?

> 5. chicken egg dep problem will be problematic for doing clean mock builds of
> both  packages (main/ifiles)

Anyone got any ideas on this? I'm quite sure initng can't be completely alone 
about this kind of problem, how do other packages solve it?

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Fedora-package-review mailing list

Reply via email to