Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tetex-dvipost - latex post filter command


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: dvipost -   |Review Request: tetex-
                   |latex post filter command   |dvipost - latex post filter
                   |                            |command




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-19 08:42 EST -------
(In reply to comment #19)
> Upstream should probably be bugged about that. If I was building it from 
source,
> I would want it in TEXMFLOCAL (or in my home dir texmf) - so it should be a
> configure switch (and probably should default to TEXMFLOCAL if no arguement 
is
> given to configure)

I agree with your analysis, Michael. This goes to my todo list with low 
priority though. :-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to