Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: serpentine


           What    |Removed                     |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |

------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-19 11:53 EST -------
$ md5sum serpentine-0.6.91-1.src.rpm
5965ec6a4622440337452084f79c5c59  serpentine-0.6.91-1.src.rpm


- rpmlint clean:
$ ls *.rpm
serpentine-0.6.91-1.noarch.rpm  serpentine-0.6.91-1.src.rpm
$ rpmlint *.rpm ; echo $?

- package and spec naming OK
- package meets guidelines
- license is GPL, matches license field spec
- license both included in source and %doc
- spec file written in English and is legible
- sources match upstream
- package builds OK on FC5 (noarch) and in FC5 and rawhide mock (noarch)
- BR's OK, on duplicates, no exeptions
- locales handled correctly
- no libraries to worry about
- not relocatable
- no directory ownership issues
- no duplicates in %files
- permissions OK, correct %defattr
- %clean section present and correct
- macro usage consistent
- code, not content
- no large docs
- docs don't affect runtime
- no pkgconfigs to worry about
- no devel sub package needed
- desktop file OK and properly installed
- scriptlets match examples from wiki


Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Fedora-package-review mailing list

Reply via email to