Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129586|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-20 07:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129723) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129723&action=view) initng 0.6.7-2 spec file (In reply to comment #290) > 1. core package contains development files (*.so); write Did I get you right now? > | Requires(post): procps > | ... > | init=$(ps --no-headers -o '%%c' 1) > | test x"$init" != xinitng || /sbin/ngc --quiet -c || : Thanks! That's a lot nicer! > in -devel. Alternatively (I would prefer that), you should create a > '-lib' subpackage with only the libraries and require this subpackage > by -devel. Something like this? > 2. the > > | if [ -x /usr/sbin/semanage ]; then > | /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng 2>/dev/null || : > | fi > > can be expressed shorter as > > | /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng 2>/dev/null || : Ok. The check was introduced since you pointed out that semanage doesn't exist in FC4... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
