Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-26 18:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > /* > * Copyright 2004 Chris Cannam, Steve Harris and Sean Bolton. > * > * Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software > * for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that the > * above copyright notice and this permission notice are included in > * all copies or substantial portions of the software. > */ > > Does this count as BSD? Yes, basically, I think so. > So, my guess is dssi-devel should be "License: LGPL", dssi-examples should be > "License: Public Domain", and the main package "License: BSD/Public Domain" > however mock complains about that one. Maybe it can just be "Distributable". I think BSD trumps Public Domain, so I'm just making it BSD. New bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi-0.9.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
