Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elektra


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-27 08:37 EST -------
Please try the new src.rpm from 
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/elektra/elektra-0.6.1-31.src.rpm

(In reply to comment #25)
> blockers: 
> * changelog 
> * source not found
> * .so for libelekra should be in a devel package

All three points fixed.


> rpmlint output: 
> W: elektra incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.1-3 0.6.1-30
> E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-filesys.so libelektra-filesys.so
> E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-fstab.so libelektra-fstab.so
> W: elektra wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
> /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/standards/signature.xml
> W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libelektratools.so
> W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libelektra.so
> W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libelektra-default.so
> E: elektra script-without-shellbang
> /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/scripts/convert-hwconfKudzu

All coherent messages fixed.


> other comments:
> * --prefix=%{_prefix} and --exec-prefix=/ were unneeded in my tests

This is correct. If removed, software won't be installed in /bin and /lib

> * The redundant %doc line is not needed in devel subpackage:
> %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog README INSTALL

Removed.


The key.3.gz conflict was also removed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to