Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elektra

------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-27 08:37 EST -------
Please try the new src.rpm from

(In reply to comment #25)
> blockers: 
> * changelog 
> * source not found
> * .so for libelekra should be in a devel package

All three points fixed.

> rpmlint output: 
> W: elektra incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.1-3 0.6.1-30
> E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/
> E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/
> W: elektra wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
> /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/standards/signature.xml
> W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/
> W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/
> W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/
> E: elektra script-without-shellbang
> /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/scripts/convert-hwconfKudzu

All coherent messages fixed.

> other comments:
> * --prefix=%{_prefix} and --exec-prefix=/ were unneeded in my tests

This is correct. If removed, software won't be installed in /bin and /lib

> * The redundant %doc line is not needed in devel subpackage:


The key.3.gz conflict was also removed.

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Fedora-package-review mailing list

Reply via email to