Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #130065|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-28 06:10 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=130155)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130155&action=view)
Patch fixing Home, End and Function keys

Yesterday I realised after leaving my PC, that I forgot to add the escape
sequences used by the function keys under the Linux Console, so here is a new
version of the patch which adds the esc-sequences for the Function keys under
the console. So now the function keys for this console ag reader not only work
under xterm but also actually on the console :). Please use this version of the
patch to build a new SRPM before importing into CVS, or replace the patch
immidiatly after import (iow before building).

The new version looks good, Approved! I'll set the status to FE-ACCEPTED as
soon as the other 2 are approved too and you get your CVS access, otherwise
this one my stay FE-ACCEPTED for a couple of days without being imported into
CVS, which will make the automated weekly FE-status reports unhappy.

Talking about the automated weekly FE-status reports, for these reports it is
important that the Summary of a review bug is always in the form of:
Review Request: %name - %summary
So not %name: %summary, please change the summary of this bug, the same goes
for the DevIL and cegui bugs, which are even more wrong with the <> added.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to