Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnubg


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189713





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-01 13:55 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> 
> > Why call autogen.sh? thats concidered bad practice unless absolutly 
> 
> I am calling autogen.sh because the source is nightly tarball from CVS not
> containing a configure file. 
> The latest available source I found is contained in a SRPM more than a year 
> old
> (http://www.acepoint.de/GnuBG/redhat/gnubg-0.15-1.src.rpm). The nightly CVS
> tarballs seem to be the only recent published sources available.

Yes,

Thats a good reason, I should have spotted that. myself :) Anyways all the other
points still remain to be fixed.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to