Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnubg

------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-01 13:55 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Why call thats concidered bad practice unless absolutly 
> I am calling because the source is nightly tarball from CVS not
> containing a configure file. 
> The latest available source I found is contained in a SRPM more than a year 
> old
> ( The nightly CVS
> tarballs seem to be the only recent published sources available.


Thats a good reason, I should have spotted that. myself :) Anyways all the other
points still remain to be fixed.

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Fedora-package-review mailing list

Reply via email to