Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: wireshark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194594 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-09 14:05 EST ------- Radek, it would be helpful if the spec was linked to outside the srpm, just makes reviews easier. NEEDSWORK: - buildroot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - You need Provides: ethereal to go along with your Obsoletes: for upgrade paths. - Summary for wireshark-gnome, surely this is for more than just "Red Hat Gnome" ? - Again, need Provides ethereal-gnome to go along w/ Obsoletes - tshark -> tethereal link is well above the comment regarding it. - files in /etc should be marked as config files, unless they are init scripts - Desktop file present but not installed using desktop-file-install (which would have a BuildRequires: on destkop-file-utils) Question: - If you take out the manual Requires, and let rpmbuild figure it out by soname requirements, does it do the right thing? THis is preferred method for Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
