Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: obconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-16 02:30 EST ------- Review for this package:- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows no error - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package obconf, in the format obconf.spec - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - MUST: The License field in the package obconf.spec file matches the actual license in COPYING file in tarball. - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. - MUST: The package successfully compiled and build into binary rpms on i386. - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included. - MUST: This Package did not contained any .la libtool archives - MUST: This Package include a obconf.desktop file, and that file is installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section with following warning obconf.desktop: key "Categories" string list not semicolon-terminated, fixing - MUST: No duplicate files in installation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
