Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pengupop - Networked Game in the vein of Move/Puzzle 
Bobble


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195846


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-18 19:45 EST -------
MUST
====
* rpmlint output clean
* Package and spec named appropriately
* Source matches upstream:
  5c213ecb3cf1bd714dbae771f97ee19a  pengupop-2.0.2.tar.gz
* GPL license ok, license file included
* Spec file legible and in Am. English
* No excessive BR:
* No locales
* No shared libs
* No need for a -devel subpackage (no headers, libs, or *.pc)
* Not relocatable
* Permissions look ok
* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned where needed
* Contains code, not content
* No need for -doc subpackage
* %doc does not affect runtine
* .desktop file installed correctly
* Does not own directories that it shouldn't
* Builds and packages on mock for:
  FC4-i386, FC4-x86_64, FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64

MUSTFIX
=======
* Missing BR: desktop-file-utils
* The %description refers to screenshots which aren't visible in the spec.
  Best just to remove the second paragraph from the %description.
* In the desktop-file-install, use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead of ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}
  for consistency.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to