Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow 

------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-19 05:24 EST -------
Review for this package:-
    Mock Build Results for i386 
    Some format as well as unused variables warnings otherwise package built
successfully for i386.

MUST Items:
     - MUST: rpmlint shows error 
     - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
     - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package sflowtool, in the
format sflowtool.spec
      - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
      - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license 
      - MUST: The License field in the package sflowtool.spec file matches the
actual license file COPYING in tarball.
      - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
      - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. 
      - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
      - MUST: This package  have a %clean section, which contains %{__rm} -rf
      - MUST: This package used macros.
      - MUST: Document files are included like README,INSTALL.

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Fedora-package-review mailing list

Reply via email to