Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: php-apc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195836 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-19 10:51 EST ------- Review: - rpmlint output: W: php-pecl-apc incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.1.4_3.0.10-3 3.0.10-3.fc5 W: php-pecl-apc invalid-license PHP License W: php-pecl-apc invalid-license PHP License W: php-pecl-apc-debuginfo invalid-license PHP License The License is actually fine, and standard for PHP packages. The changelog entry needs fixing. - package meets proposed PHP naming guidelines - spec file name is correct - license is PHP license, matches spec, text included - package meets guidelines - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstream - package builds ok in mock (FC-5 i386) - BR's OK - no locales, libraries, pkgconfigs, or subpackages to worry about - not relocatable - no directory ownership or permissions problems - no duplicate files - %clean section present and correct - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - no desktop file needed - no scriptlets Needswork: - Fix version number in changelog entry, which will shut rpmlint up Queries: - Why such a low value for apc.shm_size? This is the only value you've changed from the suggested values in the INSTALL file. - What is "Provides: php-zend_extension" for? Suggestions: - Include INSTALL as %doc; it includes useful end-user configuration info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
