Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194420 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-21 13:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > So would adding "which" to your mock buildroot, since "which" was recently > added > to the buildreq "Exceptions" list of the packaging guidelines. Yes, the latest update of mock includes which. > If I was the packager, I'd add the buildreq to the spec though; it wouldn't > have > been added to the Exceptions list if it had been up to me since it's not an > obvious requirement for package building. It is safer to add the BR for which. There is one last issue to handle. There are some licenses in the license directory. Is it certain all of them can be subsumed under the BSD license? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
