Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-23 09:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Okay, fine, I won't withdraw it now. However unfortunately I do not > understand > what is meant regarding dist tags, and have run out of time, so if the review > indicates that further changes are required then I will let it drop at that > stage. But if someone who knows more about Fedora packaging requirements > than I > do agrees with my view that this is a very useful little utility to include, > and > is willing to take on the packaging and iron out any further little problems, > then that would be much appreciated, thanks. The dist tag is described on the wiki: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag Use of it is not mandatory, but most people do use it as it's a conveient way of distinguishing packages built for different distribution releases. If you've run out of time then it's probably better to close the review. Adding packages to Fedora Extras is not a "fire and forget" process; packages need to be _maintained_, so that bug reports get answered, security issues get fixed etc. If you don't have the time to finish the submission process then it's unlikely you'll have the time to maintain the package in the longer term, so indeed it would be better off for someone else to maintain it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
